FY 2002 Columbia Plateau proposal 25048

Additional documents

TitleType
25048 Narrative Narrative

Section 1. Administrative

Proposal titleAccelerate the Application of Riparian Buffers in the Upper Deschutes Subbasin
Proposal ID25048
OrganizationWy'East Resource Conservation and Development Area (Wy'East RC&D)
Proposal contact person or principal investigator
NameMerlin Berg
Mailing address2325 River Road, Suite 3 The Dalles OR 97058
Phone / email5412966178 / merlin.berg@or.usda.gov
Manager authorizing this projectJeff Rola, Wy'East RC&D President
Review cycleColumbia Plateau
Province / SubbasinColumbia Plateau / Deschutes
Short descriptionA project to apply riparian buffers to remove sediment and nutrients, stabilize stream banks, improve fish habitat, provide food sources, nesting cover and shelter for fish and wildlife in riparian ecosystem habitat in the Upper Deschutes Basin.
Target speciesDeschutes river steelhead & chinook, resident redband and coastal cutthroat trout, bull trout, winter steelhead mid-Columbia coho & chinook, wildlife.
Project location
LatitudeLongitudeDescription
43.62 -122 Between the following four points:
43.62 -119.9 Between the following four points:
44.83 -120.43 Between the following four points:
44.83 -121.83 Between the following four points:
44.1 -120.5
Reasonable and Prudent Alternatives (RPAs)

Sponsor-reported:

RPA
Action 153

Relevant RPAs based on NMFS/BPA review:

Reviewing agencyAction #BiOp AgencyDescription
NMFS Action 153 NMFS BPA shall, working with agricultural incentive programs such as the Conservation Reserve Enhancement Program, negotiate and fund long-term protection for 100 miles of riparian buffers per year in accordance with criteria BPA and NMFS will develop by June 1, 2001.

Section 2. Past accomplishments

YearAccomplishment
2001 Accelerate the Application of Integrated Fruit Management to Reduce the Risk of Pesticide Pollution in Fifteenmile Sub-basin Orchards, project just beginning.

Section 3. Relationships to other projects

Project IDTitleDescription
BiOp: Columbia River Salmon Recovery Strategy, Action 153 This project will use USDA Conservation Reserve Programs to leverage BPA funds.

Section 4. Budget for Planning and Design phase

Task-based budget
ObjectiveTaskDuration in FYsEstimated 2002 costSubcontractor
1. Plan and implement riparian ecosystem restoration in the upper Deschutes subbasin (Crook, Deschutes and Jefferson Counties). a. Riparian Restoration Planning 3 $44,391
a.1 - Priority Setting. Coordinate with stakeholder organizations to establish priorities where riparian ecosystem restoration is most critical. $0
a.2 - Obtain Producer Commitment Meet with interested landowners on site to assess eligibility of stream reach for program. Anadromous fish streams are eligible. $0
a.3 - Develop CRP/CREP plan. Resource inventory and environmental checklist are completed early in the nine step planning process. $0
Outyear objectives-based budget
ObjectiveStarting FYEnding FYEstimated cost
1. Plan and implement riparian ecosystem restoration in the upper Deschutes subbasin (Crook, Deschutes and Jefferson Counties). 2003 2004 $86,780
Outyear budgets for Planning and Design phase
FY 2003FY 2004
$42,788$43,992

Section 5. Budget for Construction and Implementation phase

Task-based budget
ObjectiveTaskDuration in FYsEstimated 2002 costSubcontractor
1. Plan and implement riparian ecosystem restoration in the upper Deschutes subbasin (Crook, Deschutes and Jefferson Counties). 3 $14,797
Outyear objectives-based budget
ObjectiveStarting FYEnding FYEstimated cost
Objective 1. Plan and implement riparian ecosystem restoration… ; Task b Riparian Restoration Plan Implementation 2003 2004 $28,927
Outyear budgets for Construction and Implementation phase
FY 2003FY 2004
$14,263$14,664

Section 6. Budget for Operations and Maintenance phase

Task-based budget
ObjectiveTaskDuration in FYsEstimated 2002 costSubcontractor
Outyear objectives-based budget
ObjectiveStarting FYEnding FYEstimated cost
Outyear budgets for Operations and Maintenance phase

Section 7. Budget for Monitoring and Evaluation phase

Task-based budget
ObjectiveTaskDuration in FYsEstimated 2002 costSubcontractor
Objective 1. Plan and implement riparian ecosystem restoration in the upper Deschutes subbasin (Crook, Deschutes and Jefferson Counties). Task c. Monitoring &Evaluation 3 $14,797
Outyear objectives-based budget
ObjectiveStarting FYEnding FYEstimated cost
Objective 1. Plan and implement riparian ecosystem restoration…; Task c. Monitoring &Evaluation 2003 2004 $28,927
Outyear budgets for Monitoring and Evaluation phase
FY 2003FY 2004
$14,263$14,664

Section 8. Estimated budget summary

Itemized budget
ItemNoteFY 2002 cost
Personnel FTE: 1.25 $38,045
Fringe Insurance, payroll, retirement, others $11,414
Supplies Field,general office, postage, publications, presentation, reproduction, printing, Internet service $1,000
Travel Vehicle; lease 400 /mo & operateing costs @ 15,000 mi/yr @ .32/mi Meetings, workshops, training $12,600
Indirect $0
Capital Computer; laptop, software Camera $4,200
NEPA Programatic NEPA completed $0
Subcontractor $0
Other Project management @ 10% of project cost $6,726
$73,985
Total estimated budget
Total FY 2002 cost$73,985
Amount anticipated from previously committed BPA funds$0
Total FY 2002 budget request$73,985
FY 2002 forecast from 2001$0
% change from forecast0.0%
Cost sharing
OrganizationItem or service providedAmountCash or in-kind
NRCS phone, copy, office space; 3 years $10,800 in-kind
NRCS, Coordinator, 312 hr, 3 years $9,547 in-kind
USDA - Farm Service Agency & participating agriculture producers Farm program rental, incentives and cost share to install practices (see explanation) $3,000,000 in-kind
Oregon Climate Trust & Deschutes Resource Conservancy Additional incentives to secure permanent landowner commitments to riparian restoration - grant applied to Oregon Climate Trust, pending $2,000,000 in-kind
Other budget explanation

USDA Farm Service Agency contract with agriculture proders to enroll eligible land into the CRP program. This project will LEVERAGE $3,000,000 in land rental, incentives and conservation practices cost share to restore riparian ecosystems, assuming CRP funds are available depending on congressional action. In some cases the agriculture producer contributes up to 25% cost-share to install conservation practices. The State of Oregon contributes 25% of the costs for the Conservation Reserve Enhancement Program (CREP). Climate Trust and Deschutes Resource Conservancy funding contingent upon grant award.


Reviews and recommendations

This information was not provided on the original proposals, but was generated during the review process.

Recommendation:
Fundable - no response required
Date:
Jun 15, 2001

Comment:

Fundable. See comments above for this set of SWCD proposals. The cost effectiveness of this and similar projects for accelerating habitat restoration activities is impressive.


Recommendation:
Recommended Action
Date:
Aug 3, 2001

Comment:

Activities associated with this proposal would be performed in an area of Trout Creek that is not being addressed by ODFW and Jefferson County. Although there is insufficient detail to determine whether the M&E activities are adequate, reviewers suggest that there is intent to perform M&E activities.
Recommendation:
Fund
Date:
Aug 10, 2001

Comment:

Fundable. See comments below for this set of SWCD proposals. The cost effectiveness of this and similar projects for accelerating habitat restoration activities is impressive.
See detailed ISRP Comments on CRP, CREP, Buffer, and No-till Proposals
Recommendation:
Date:
Oct 1, 2001

Comment:

Statement of Potential Biological Benefit to ESU
Project will implement riparian buffer program using cost share provided by USDA, State of Oregon, and private landowners

Comments
Project will implement RPA 153 only if permanent or long term easement. Support if permanent easement, or at least > 15 years. Easement should be consistent with Oregon CREP. This project needs to be implemented consistent with limiting factors & problem locations identified in subbasin summaries & and eventually subbasin planning to ensure fisheries benefits to target species.

Already ESA Req? no

Biop? yes


Recommendation:
Rank D
Date:
Oct 16, 2001

Comment:

It is not clear if this project plans to use the same USDA funds as project no. 25014. If so, these funds would be better applied in Wasco County, in the lower Deschutes, in the habitat of anadromous fish. BPA does not intend to fund habitat work that occurs in that part of the Deschutes River Basin that lies above the Pelton-Round Butte dams complex.
Recommendation:
Do Not Fund
Date:
Jan 3, 2002

Comment: