FY 2001 High Priority proposal 23004

Section 1. General administrative information
Section 2. Past accomplishments
Section 3. Relationships to other projects
Section 4. Budgets for planning/design phase
Section 5. Budgets for construction/implementation phase
Section 6. Budgets for operations/maintenance phase
Section 7. Budgets for monitoring/evaluation phase
Section 8. Budget summary

Reviews and Recommendations

Additional documents

Title	Type
23004 Narrative	Narrative

Section 1. Administrative

Proposal title	Support for the Development and Certification (FDA approval) of Effective Drugs and Anesthesia for Fish
Proposal ID	23004
Organization	U.S Fish and Wildlife Service Bozeman National INAD Office 4050 Bridger Canyon Road Bozeman, MT 59715 (USFWS/Bozeman NIO)
Proposal contact person or principal investigator
Name	Dr. David Erdahl
Mailing address	4050 Bridger Canyon Road Bozeman, MT 59715
Phone / email	4065879265 / dave_erdahl@fws.gov
Manager authorizing this project	Dr. David Erdahl
Review cycle	FY 2001 High Priority
Province / Subbasin	Systemwide / Systemwide
Short description	Evaluate the efficacy and target animal safety of Aqui-S (an anesthetic) and florfenicol (an antibacterial agent) for use in fish.
Target species	Chinook salmon, Coho salmon, Sockeye salmon, Chum Salmon, Steelhead trout, Rainbow trout, All salmonids

Project location

Latitude	Longitude	Description

Reasonable and Prudent Alternatives (RPAs)

Sponsor-reported:

RPA

Relevant RPAs based on NMFS/BPA review:

Reviewing agency	Action #	BiOp Agency	Description

Section 2. Past accomplishments

Year	Accomplishment

Section 3. Relationships to other projects

Project ID	Title	Description

Section 4. Budget for Planning and Design phase

Task-based budget

Objective	Task	Duration in FYs	Estimated 2001 cost	Subcontractor

Outyear objectives-based budget

Objective	Starting FY	Ending FY	Estimated cost

Outyear budgets for Planning and Design phase

Section 5. Budget for Construction and Implementation phase

Task-based budget

Objective	Task	Duration in FYs	Estimated 2001 cost	Subcontractor

Outyear objectives-based budget

Objective	Starting FY	Ending FY	Estimated cost

Outyear budgets for Construction and Implementation phase

Section 6. Budget for Operations and Maintenance phase

Task-based budget

Objective	Task	Duration in FYs	Estimated 2001 cost	Subcontractor

Outyear objectives-based budget

Objective	Starting FY	Ending FY	Estimated cost

Outyear budgets for Operations and Maintenance phase

Section 7. Budget for Monitoring and Evaluation phase

Task-based budget

Objective	Task	Duration in FYs	Estimated 2001 cost	Subcontractor

Outyear objectives-based budget

Objective	Starting FY	Ending FY	Estimated cost

Outyear budgets for Monitoring and Evaluation phase

Section 8. Estimated budget summary

Itemized budget

Item	Note	FY 2001 cost
Personnel	FTE: GS-7 fisheries biologist (1); GS-5 technician (1)	$68,000
Fringe	(included under peronnel costs)	$0
Supplies	Fish culture, laboratory	$40,000
Travel	Required for completion of efficacy studies	$25,000
Indirect	Administrative overhead @19%	$38,000
Subcontractor	Western Fisheries Research Center (assistance in the conduct of Aqui-S efficacy studies)	$24,000
Other	Quality assurance, histology, analytical, compensation to participating field stations	$45,000
		$240,000

Total estimated budget

Total FY 2001 cost	$240,000
Amount anticipated from previously committed BPA funds	$0
Total FY 2001 budget request	$240,000
FY 2001 forecast from 2000	$0
% change from forecast	0.0%

Cost sharing

Organization	Item or service provided	Amount	Cash or in-kind

Reviews and recommendations

This information was not provided on the original proposals, but was generated during the review process.

REVIEW:
ISRP Review

Recommendation:
N/A

Date:
Feb 1, 2001

Comment:

This proposal does not address imminent risks to ESA stocks by offering direct on-the-ground benefits with one-time funding.

REVIEW:
CBFWA Funding Recommendation

Recommendation:
HP "B" -BiOp P

Date:
Feb 1, 2001

Comment:

This project is considered a high priority by CBFWA and should be funded immediately. However, this project does not meet the criteria for high priority as defined by the NWPPC for this process. This project is in the NMFS Biological Opinion as a conservation measure and will be required for handling adult salmon at mainstem dams.

REVIEW:
NMFS Review

Recommendation:

Date:
Feb 26, 2001

Comment:

Two… proposals were submitted in response to the High Priority solicitation that we believe are of such importance and urgency that we designated them as BiOp projects even though they were given a "Hi Priority - B" rating. These were, Support for the Development and Certification (FDA approval) of Effective Drugs and Anesthesia for Fish (proposal number 23004), and Reproductive Success of Naturally Spawning Wild and Hatchery-origin Spring Chinook (proposal number 23034). We urge the Council to recommend proceeding with these projects immediately.