FY 2001 High Priority proposal 23016
Contents
Section 1. General administrative information
Section 2. Past accomplishments
Section 3. Relationships to other projects
Section 4. Budgets for planning/design phase
Section 5. Budgets for construction/implementation phase
Section 6. Budgets for operations/maintenance phase
Section 7. Budgets for monitoring/evaluation phase
Section 8. Budget summary
Reviews and Recommendations
Additional documents
| Title | Type |
|---|---|
| 23016 Narrative | Narrative |
Section 1. Administrative
| Proposal title | Reconnection of floodplain slough habitat to the Kootenai River |
| Proposal ID | 23016 |
| Organization | Kootenai Tribe of Idaho (KTOI) |
| Proposal contact person or principal investigator | |
| Name | Scott Soults |
| Mailing address | P.O. Box 1269 Bonners Ferry, ID 83805 |
| Phone / email | 2082673620 / soults@kootenai.org; jascott@jub.com |
| Manager authorizing this project | Scott Soults |
| Review cycle | FY 2001 High Priority |
| Province / Subbasin | Mountain Columbia / Kootenai |
| Short description | Reconnect slough and floodplain habitat that has been isolated from the Kootenai River by dikes. |
| Target species | Kootenai River white sturgeon |
Project location
| Latitude | Longitude | Description |
|---|---|---|
| 48.9999 | -116.5027 | Kootenai River |
Reasonable and Prudent Alternatives (RPAs)
Sponsor-reported:
| RPA |
|---|
Relevant RPAs based on NMFS/BPA review:
| Reviewing agency | Action # | BiOp Agency | Description |
|---|
Section 2. Past accomplishments
| Year | Accomplishment |
|---|
Section 3. Relationships to other projects
| Project ID | Title | Description |
|---|
Section 4. Budget for Planning and Design phase
Task-based budget
| Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 2001 cost | Subcontractor |
|---|
Outyear objectives-based budget
| Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
|---|
Outyear budgets for Planning and Design phase
Section 5. Budget for Construction and Implementation phase
Task-based budget
| Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 2001 cost | Subcontractor |
|---|
Outyear objectives-based budget
| Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
|---|
Outyear budgets for Construction and Implementation phase
Section 6. Budget for Operations and Maintenance phase
Task-based budget
| Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 2001 cost | Subcontractor |
|---|
Outyear objectives-based budget
| Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
|---|
Outyear budgets for Operations and Maintenance phase
| FY 2002 |
|---|
| $500,000 |
Section 7. Budget for Monitoring and Evaluation phase
Task-based budget
| Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 2001 cost | Subcontractor |
|---|
Outyear objectives-based budget
| Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
|---|
Outyear budgets for Monitoring and Evaluation phase
| FY 2003 | FY 2004 | FY 2005 |
|---|---|---|
| $40,000 | $40,000 | $40,000 |
Section 8. Estimated budget summary
Itemized budget
| Item | Note | FY 2001 cost |
|---|---|---|
| Personnel | FTE: 0.25 @ $16/hr | $8,320 |
| Fringe | 33% of salaries | $2,746 |
| Indirect | 59% of salaries | $4,908 |
| Subcontractor | For tasks identified in Section 2, including lab work and sample analysis. | $124,000 |
| $139,974 | ||
Total estimated budget
| Total FY 2001 cost | $139,974 |
| Amount anticipated from previously committed BPA funds | $0 |
| Total FY 2001 budget request | $139,974 |
| FY 2001 forecast from 2000 | $0 |
| % change from forecast | 0.0% |
Cost sharing
| Organization | Item or service provided | Amount | Cash or in-kind |
|---|
Reviews and recommendations
This information was not provided on the original proposals, but was generated during the review process.
Comment:
This resident fish proposal does not address imminent risks to ESA stocks by offering direct on-the-ground benefits with one-time funding. The proposal focuses on assessment and planning. The on-the-ground element appears to be planned for 2002. This proposal is being reviewed as part of the Mountain Columbia review, which is an appropriate venue for review and potential funding.Comment: