FY 2001 High Priority proposal 23030

Additional documents

TitleType
23030 Narrative Narrative

Section 1. Administrative

Proposal titleInitiate wetland and wet prairie restoration and restore historic stream function, Bessett Property, Willamette Valley, Oregon.
Proposal ID23030
OrganizationNorthwest Habitat Institute (NHI)
Proposal contact person or principal investigator
NameChris Kiilsgaard
Mailing addressPO Box 855 Corvallis, Oregon 97339
Phone / email5417532199 / chris@nwhi.org
Manager authorizing this projectThomas O'Neil
Review cycleFY 2001 High Priority
Province / SubbasinLower Columbia /
Short descriptionThis wetland restoration will return 68 acres of farmed wetland and diked stream to a wetland system consisting of a meandering overflow channel, shallow water flooded zone, scattered vernal ponds and a wooded riparian zone.
Target speciesUpper Willamette River chinook salmon, Upper Willamette River steelhead, dusky Canada goose, western pond turtle, Oregon spotted frog
Project location
LatitudeLongitudeDescription
44.9281 -123.1811 Baskett Slough Creek
Reasonable and Prudent Alternatives (RPAs)

Sponsor-reported:

RPA

Relevant RPAs based on NMFS/BPA review:

Reviewing agencyAction #BiOp AgencyDescription

Section 2. Past accomplishments

YearAccomplishment

Section 3. Relationships to other projects

Project IDTitleDescription

Section 4. Budget for Planning and Design phase

Task-based budget
ObjectiveTaskDuration in FYsEstimated 2001 costSubcontractor
Outyear objectives-based budget
ObjectiveStarting FYEnding FYEstimated cost
Outyear budgets for Planning and Design phase

Section 5. Budget for Construction and Implementation phase

Task-based budget
ObjectiveTaskDuration in FYsEstimated 2001 costSubcontractor
Outyear objectives-based budget
ObjectiveStarting FYEnding FYEstimated cost
Outyear budgets for Construction and Implementation phase

Section 6. Budget for Operations and Maintenance phase

Task-based budget
ObjectiveTaskDuration in FYsEstimated 2001 costSubcontractor
Outyear objectives-based budget
ObjectiveStarting FYEnding FYEstimated cost
Outyear budgets for Operations and Maintenance phase
FY 2003FY 2004FY 2002
$3,000$3,000$17,000

Section 7. Budget for Monitoring and Evaluation phase

Task-based budget
ObjectiveTaskDuration in FYsEstimated 2001 costSubcontractor
Outyear objectives-based budget
ObjectiveStarting FYEnding FYEstimated cost
Outyear budgets for Monitoring and Evaluation phase
FY 2003FY 2004FY 2005
$3,900$3,900$3,900

Section 8. Estimated budget summary

Itemized budget
ItemNoteFY 2001 cost
Personnel FTE: .25 NHI Senior Staff habitat bio. @ 40/hr; .35 NHI biologist @ 35/hr $36,000
Fringe @ .30% $10,800
Supplies water control structures, culvert pipe, native grass,forb seed,trees, & shrubs. $7,400
Travel 50 trips, 60 miles round trip@ 0.31/mile $930
Indirect @ 0.26% $16,570
Subcontractor 2300 cubic yard scraper $17,200
Other Planting crew to plant 7 acres trees & shrubs $10,500
Subcontractor lease backhoe, bulldozer & misc. equipt. $13,230
$112,630
Total estimated budget
Total FY 2001 cost$112,630
Amount anticipated from previously committed BPA funds$0
Total FY 2001 budget request$112,630
FY 2001 forecast from 2000$0
% change from forecast0.0%
Cost sharing
OrganizationItem or service providedAmountCash or in-kind
USDA-NRCS Wetland Reserve Program Permanent Conservation Property Easement $156,400 cash
Oregon Watershed Enhancement Board Grant money for restoration & monitoring $35,000 cash
Norcross,Ferguson,Autzen Foundations Grant money for restoration & monitoring $8,000 cash
Oregon Dept Fish & Wildlife Technical oversight, labor, machinery $3,700 in-kind
US Fish & Wildlife Service Technical oversight, labor, machinery $5,500 in-kind

Reviews and recommendations

This information was not provided on the original proposals, but was generated during the review process.

Recommendation:
C
Date:
Feb 1, 2001

Comment:

This is an excellent proposal to improve and protect wetlands on 68 acres in a conservation easement in the Willamette Valley. However, the project is not tightly linked to known salmon or steelhead populations and their use of the area. This project "might" create rearing habitat, as there "may be" spring chinook and winter steelhead in the vicinity. Benefit to anadromous fish is not well demonstrated. However, benefits to western pond turtle and Oregon spotted frog look promising. The proposal includes excellent cost sharing with long term O&M and M&E provided by the Oregon Watershed Enhancement Board and foundation grants. The budget appears to be modest for the benefits gained.
Recommendation:
HP "A"
Date:
Feb 1, 2001

Comment:

This appears to be a good project. The proposal lists biological objectives for birds.