FY 2001 High Priority proposal 23034
Contents
Section 1. General administrative information
Section 2. Past accomplishments
Section 3. Relationships to other projects
Section 4. Budgets for planning/design phase
Section 5. Budgets for construction/implementation phase
Section 6. Budgets for operations/maintenance phase
Section 7. Budgets for monitoring/evaluation phase
Section 8. Budget summary
Reviews and Recommendations
Additional documents
Title | Type |
---|---|
23034 Narrative | Narrative |
Section 1. Administrative
Proposal title | Reproductive Success Of Naturally Spawning Wild and Hatchery-origin Spring Chinook |
Proposal ID | 23034 |
Organization | Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife (WDFW) |
Proposal contact person or principal investigator | |
Name | Steve Schroder |
Mailing address | MS 43200, 600 Capitol Way North Olympia, Washington 98501 |
Phone / email | 3609022751 / schrosls@dfw.wa.gov |
Manager authorizing this project | Steve Schroder |
Review cycle | FY 2001 High Priority |
Province / Subbasin | Columbia Plateau / Yakima |
Short description | Wild and hatchery-orgin spring chinook will be allowed to reproduce in an experimental stream. Behavioral observations and DNA-based pedigree analyses will be used to compare their reproductive success. |
Target species | Spring Chinook |
Project location
Latitude | Longitude | Description |
---|---|---|
47.182 | -120.9798 | Cle Elum Hatchery |
Reasonable and Prudent Alternatives (RPAs)
Sponsor-reported:
RPA |
---|
Relevant RPAs based on NMFS/BPA review:
Reviewing agency | Action # | BiOp Agency | Description |
---|
Section 2. Past accomplishments
Year | Accomplishment |
---|
Section 3. Relationships to other projects
Project ID | Title | Description |
---|
Section 4. Budget for Planning and Design phase
Task-based budget
Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 2001 cost | Subcontractor |
---|
Outyear objectives-based budget
Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
---|
Outyear budgets for Planning and Design phase
Section 5. Budget for Construction and Implementation phase
Task-based budget
Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 2001 cost | Subcontractor |
---|
Outyear objectives-based budget
Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
---|
Outyear budgets for Construction and Implementation phase
Section 6. Budget for Operations and Maintenance phase
Task-based budget
Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 2001 cost | Subcontractor |
---|
Outyear objectives-based budget
Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
---|
Outyear budgets for Operations and Maintenance phase
FY 2003 | FY 2004 | FY 2002 |
---|---|---|
$214,100 | $76,000 | $207,860 |
Section 7. Budget for Monitoring and Evaluation phase
Task-based budget
Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 2001 cost | Subcontractor |
---|
Outyear objectives-based budget
Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
---|
Outyear budgets for Monitoring and Evaluation phase
Section 8. Estimated budget summary
Itemized budget
Item | Note | FY 2001 cost |
---|---|---|
Personnel | FTE: 1..92 | $88,728 |
Fringe | $20,798 | |
Supplies | $101,016 | |
Indirect | 25% | $50,132 |
$260,674 |
Total estimated budget
Total FY 2001 cost | $260,674 |
Amount anticipated from previously committed BPA funds | $0 |
Total FY 2001 budget request | $260,674 |
FY 2001 forecast from 2000 | $0 |
% change from forecast | 0.0% |
Cost sharing
Organization | Item or service provided | Amount | Cash or in-kind |
---|
Reviews and recommendations
This information was not provided on the original proposals, but was generated during the review process.
Comment:
This proposed behavioral study of hatchery fish does not address imminent risks to ESA stocks by offering direct on-the-ground benefits with one-time funding. The ISRP has noted numerous times that this work needs to be done; however, it does not address an imminent risk – it does address a potential long-term risk.Comment:
This is a feasibility study under the YKFP and by itself will not have any direct benefit to salmon.Comment:
Two… proposals were submitted in response to the High Priority solicitation that we believe are of such importance and urgency that we designated them as BiOp projects even though they were given a "Hi Priority - B" rating. These were, Support for the Development and Certification (FDA approval) of Effective Drugs and Anesthesia for Fish (proposal number 23004), and Reproductive Success of Naturally Spawning Wild and Hatchery-origin Spring Chinook (proposal number 23034). We urge the Council to recommend proceeding with these projects immediately.Comment:
This topic is extremely important, and must be addressed thoroughly in the very near future. This project is a good beginning to an appropriate evaluation, but does not encompass the entire life cycle. Dependent on favorable scientific review of this proposal, this project could be a high NMFS priority for monitoring and evaluation.