FY 2001 High Priority proposal 23038
Contents
Section 1. General administrative information
Section 2. Past accomplishments
Section 3. Relationships to other projects
Section 4. Budgets for planning/design phase
Section 5. Budgets for construction/implementation phase
Section 6. Budgets for operations/maintenance phase
Section 7. Budgets for monitoring/evaluation phase
Section 8. Budget summary
Reviews and Recommendations
Additional documents
Title | Type |
---|---|
23038 Narrative | Narrative |
Section 1. Administrative
Proposal title | Yakima Basin Inventory and Assessment (SSHIAP), and Study and Model Integration |
Proposal ID | 23038 |
Organization | Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife (WDFW) |
Proposal contact person or principal investigator | |
Name | Richard Visser David Johnson |
Mailing address | 1701 S 24th Ave 600 capital Way North Yakima WA 98902 Olympia WA 98501-1091 |
Phone / email | 5094579308 / visserhv@dfw.wa.gov; johnsdhj@dfw.wa.gov. |
Manager authorizing this project | David Johnson |
Review cycle | FY 2001 High Priority |
Province / Subbasin | Columbia Plateau / Yakima |
Short description | Initiate SSHIAP and coordinate, integrate and enhance existing studies, assessment, and models (EDT, Reaches, LFA, etc.) which will significantly advance the Yakima Basin’s ability to identify and prioritize projects for salmon recovery in the basin. |
Target species | Mid-Columbia Steelhead, Spring and Fall Chinook, Coho, Bull Trout and other resident salmonids |
Project location
Latitude | Longitude | Description |
---|---|---|
46.73 | -120.67 | Yakima subbasin |
Reasonable and Prudent Alternatives (RPAs)
Sponsor-reported:
RPA |
---|
Relevant RPAs based on NMFS/BPA review:
Reviewing agency | Action # | BiOp Agency | Description |
---|
Section 2. Past accomplishments
Year | Accomplishment |
---|
Section 3. Relationships to other projects
Project ID | Title | Description |
---|
Section 4. Budget for Planning and Design phase
Task-based budget
Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 2001 cost | Subcontractor |
---|
Outyear objectives-based budget
Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
---|
Outyear budgets for Planning and Design phase
Section 5. Budget for Construction and Implementation phase
Task-based budget
Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 2001 cost | Subcontractor |
---|
Outyear objectives-based budget
Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
---|
Outyear budgets for Construction and Implementation phase
Section 6. Budget for Operations and Maintenance phase
Task-based budget
Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 2001 cost | Subcontractor |
---|
Outyear objectives-based budget
Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
---|
Outyear budgets for Operations and Maintenance phase
FY 2002 |
---|
$93,000 |
Section 7. Budget for Monitoring and Evaluation phase
Task-based budget
Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 2001 cost | Subcontractor |
---|
Outyear objectives-based budget
Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
---|
Outyear budgets for Monitoring and Evaluation phase
Section 8. Estimated budget summary
Itemized budget
Item | Note | FY 2001 cost |
---|---|---|
Personnel | FTE: 2 1/2 | $155,000 |
Supplies | Computer Hardware | $6,500 |
Other | Overhead | $32,500 |
$194,000 |
Total estimated budget
Total FY 2001 cost | $194,000 |
Amount anticipated from previously committed BPA funds | $0 |
Total FY 2001 budget request | $194,000 |
FY 2001 forecast from 2000 | $0 |
% change from forecast | 0.0% |
Cost sharing
Organization | Item or service provided | Amount | Cash or in-kind |
---|---|---|---|
CWU | Office facilities and software licenses | $24,200 | in-kind |
WDFW | Supervisory and Corrdination Support | $8,000 | in-kind |
Reviews and recommendations
This information was not provided on the original proposals, but was generated during the review process.
Comment:
This proposal for survey and protocol refinement does not address imminent risks to ESA stocks by offering direct on-the-ground benefits with one-time funding. The project is for inventory and assessment that should be done.Comment:
Assessment work will not provide direct benefits.