FY 2001 High Priority proposal 23041

Section 1. General administrative information
Section 2. Past accomplishments
Section 3. Relationships to other projects
Section 4. Budgets for planning/design phase
Section 5. Budgets for construction/implementation phase
Section 6. Budgets for operations/maintenance phase
Section 7. Budgets for monitoring/evaluation phase
Section 8. Budget summary

Reviews and Recommendations

Additional documents

Title	Type
23041 Narrative	Narrative

Section 1. Administrative

Proposal title	Restoration of ecosystem nutrient levels in the Columbia Basin
Proposal ID	23041
Organization	Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife (WDFW)
Proposal contact person or principal investigator
Name	Hal Michael
Mailing address	600 Capitol Way N Olympia, WA 98501-1091
Phone / email	3609022659 / michahhm@dfw.wa.gov
Manager authorizing this project	Lew Atkins
Review cycle	FY 2001 High Priority
Province / Subbasin	Systemwide / Systemwide
Short description	The project will establish specific projects which will distribute salmon carcasses, delayed-release fertilizers and salmon carcass analogs (briquettes) to increase nutrients in streams to increase growth and survival of fluvial rearing salmonids.
Target species	chinook, coho, steelhead, cutthroat, native char, and all other fish rearing in stream reached historically accessible to anadromous salmonids

Project location

Latitude	Longitude	Description

Reasonable and Prudent Alternatives (RPAs)

Sponsor-reported:

RPA

Relevant RPAs based on NMFS/BPA review:

Reviewing agency	Action #	BiOp Agency	Description

Section 2. Past accomplishments

Year	Accomplishment

Section 3. Relationships to other projects

Project ID	Title	Description

Section 4. Budget for Planning and Design phase

Task-based budget

Objective	Task	Duration in FYs	Estimated 2001 cost	Subcontractor

Outyear objectives-based budget

Objective	Starting FY	Ending FY	Estimated cost

Outyear budgets for Planning and Design phase

Section 5. Budget for Construction and Implementation phase

Task-based budget

Objective	Task	Duration in FYs	Estimated 2001 cost	Subcontractor

Outyear objectives-based budget

Objective	Starting FY	Ending FY	Estimated cost

Outyear budgets for Construction and Implementation phase

Section 6. Budget for Operations and Maintenance phase

Task-based budget

Objective	Task	Duration in FYs	Estimated 2001 cost	Subcontractor

Outyear objectives-based budget

Objective	Starting FY	Ending FY	Estimated cost

Outyear budgets for Operations and Maintenance phase

FY 2003	FY 2004	FY 2005	FY 2002
$63,314	$66,480	$69,804	$60,299

Section 7. Budget for Monitoring and Evaluation phase

Task-based budget

Objective	Task	Duration in FYs	Estimated 2001 cost	Subcontractor

Outyear objectives-based budget

Objective	Starting FY	Ending FY	Estimated cost

Outyear budgets for Monitoring and Evaluation phase

Section 8. Estimated budget summary

Itemized budget

Item	Note	FY 2001 cost
Personnel	FTE: .33	$15,588
Fringe		$3,806
Supplies		$22,548
Travel		$4,000
Indirect		$11,486
		$57,428

Total estimated budget

Total FY 2001 cost	$57,428
Amount anticipated from previously committed BPA funds	$0
Total FY 2001 budget request	$57,428
FY 2001 forecast from 2000	$0
% change from forecast	0.0%

Cost sharing

Organization	Item or service provided	Amount	Cash or in-kind

Reviews and recommendations

This information was not provided on the original proposals, but was generated during the review process.

REVIEW:
ISRP Review

Recommendation:
N/A

Date:
Feb 1, 2001

Comment:

This proposal fails the criteria. It is a multi-year proposal that involves no science program, and defines no methods. This proposal would not rank in the top of the proposals submitted for the "Innovative" proposal solicitation to test nutrient supplementation.

REVIEW:
CBFWA Funding Recommendation

Recommendation:
Not HP

Date:
Feb 1, 2001

Comment:

Value of this project depends on whether nutrient levels are limiting. Tribal support is predicated on there being sufficient hatchery returns to meet tribal member needs as well as this study's needs. This project is not directly related to the project proposed under the innovative category. This would be a process related undertaking rather than an investigative one.