Section 1. Administrative
Proposal title | Acquire Prime Salmonid Spawning and Rearing Habitat on Entiat River |
Proposal ID | 23055 |
Organization | Chelan-Douglas Land Trust (CDLT) |
Proposal contact person or principal investigator |
Name | Gordon Congdon |
Mailing address | P.O. Box 4461 Wenatchee, WA 98807 |
Phone / email | 5096679708 / cdlt@cdlandtrust.org |
Manager authorizing this project | Gordon Congdon |
Review cycle | FY 2001 High Priority |
Province / Subbasin | Columbia Cascade / Entiat |
Short description | Acquire and protect from development key areas of salmonid spawning and rearing habitat in the "stillwaters" section of the Entiat River. |
Target species | chinook salmon, steelhead, bull trout |
Project location
Latitude | Longitude | Description |
47.85 |
-120.42 |
Entiat River |
Reasonable and Prudent Alternatives (RPAs)
Relevant RPAs based on NMFS/BPA review:
Reviewing agency | Action # | BiOp Agency | Description |
Section 2. Past accomplishments
Section 3. Relationships to other projects
Project ID | Title | Description |
Section 4. Budget for Planning and Design phase
Task-based budget
Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 2001 cost | Subcontractor |
Outyear objectives-based budget
Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
Outyear budgets for Planning and Design phase
Section 5. Budget for Construction and Implementation phase
Task-based budget
Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 2001 cost | Subcontractor |
Outyear objectives-based budget
Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
Outyear budgets for Construction and Implementation phase
Section 6. Budget for Operations and Maintenance phase
Task-based budget
Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 2001 cost | Subcontractor |
Outyear objectives-based budget
Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
Outyear budgets for Operations and Maintenance phase
FY 2002 | FY 2003 | FY 2004 | FY 2005 |
---|
$3,000 | $3,000 | $3,000 | $3,000 |
Section 7. Budget for Monitoring and Evaluation phase
Task-based budget
Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 2001 cost | Subcontractor |
Outyear objectives-based budget
Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
Outyear budgets for Monitoring and Evaluation phase
FY 2002 | FY 2003 | FY 2004 | FY 2005 |
---|
$2,000 | $2,000 | $2,000 | $2,000 |
Section 8. Estimated budget summary
Itemized budget
Item | Note | FY 2001 cost |
Personnel |
FTE: One half |
$15,000 |
Supplies |
Trees, shrubs, logs, etc. |
$10,000 |
Travel |
1000 miles @.32/mi |
$320 |
Indirect |
Administrative, legal, etc. |
$25,000 |
Capital |
Land acquisition |
$1,361,000 |
| $1,411,320 |
Total estimated budget
Total FY 2001 cost | $1,411,320 |
Amount anticipated from previously committed BPA funds | $0 |
Total FY 2001 budget request | $1,411,320 |
FY 2001 forecast from 2000 | $0 |
% change from forecast | 0.0% |
Cost sharing
Organization | Item or service provided | Amount | Cash or in-kind |
Salmon Recovery Funding Board |
Cash, amount unknown until January 26, 2001 |
$0 |
cash |
United States Forest Service |
Service |
$0 |
in-kind |
United States Fish & Wildlife Service |
Service |
$0 |
in-kind |
Chelan County Conservation District |
Service |
$0 |
in-kind |
Reviews and recommendations
This information was not provided on the original proposals, but was generated during the review process.
Recommendation:
A
Date:
Feb 1, 2001
Comment:
This proposal is to acquire land adjacent to the Entiat River and protect it from development. The area includes 3 miles of some of the most important spawning and rearing habitat for salmonids in the Entiat Basin, including chinook, steelhead and bull trout. Landowners have agreed to sell at the prices specified in the proposal. The proposal is well presented, with strong scientific context and excellent coordination. There is a high probability that it will produce significant measurable benefits. However, they should have provided data on stock status and instream water rights. The value to fish is implicit in broad statements on the importance of the reach.
Recommendation:
HP "A" -BiOp
Date:
Feb 1, 2001
Comment:
This project would provide significant benefits to wildlife.
Recommendation:
Fund: Lower Priority
Date:
Feb 26, 2001
Comment:
Lower PriorityAs described in our cover letter, several of these proposals have associated monitoring to determine the status of these properties before actions are implemented. This monitoring does not fall in the Tier 3 category but is extremely worthwhile and NMFS recommends that it be fully funded: 23055 - Acquire habitat on Entiat River. No actions planned (just acquisition). This area appears to be high quality now, with little improvement possible. Note, however, that if this acquisition includes water rights and restoration of in-stream flows, it should become a high priority project for Tier 3 evaluation.