FY 2001 High Priority proposal 23075
Contents
Section 1. General administrative information
Section 2. Past accomplishments
Section 3. Relationships to other projects
Section 4. Budgets for planning/design phase
Section 5. Budgets for construction/implementation phase
Section 6. Budgets for operations/maintenance phase
Section 7. Budgets for monitoring/evaluation phase
Section 8. Budget summary
Reviews and Recommendations
Additional documents
Title | Type |
---|---|
23075 Narrative | Narrative |
Section 1. Administrative
Proposal title | Life history strategies in Oncorhynchus mykiss: interactions between anadromous and resident forms. |
Proposal ID | 23075 |
Organization | Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife (ODFW) |
Proposal contact person or principal investigator | |
Name | Timothy A. Whitesel |
Mailing address | ODFW, 2501 SW First Ave. Portland, Oregon, 97207 |
Phone / email | 5038725252 / timothy.a.whitesel@state.or.us |
Manager authorizing this project | Bob Hooton |
Review cycle | FY 2001 High Priority |
Province / Subbasin | Blue Mountain / Grande Ronde |
Short description | Provide information that will allow biologists to better understand the relationship between the various life history forms exhibited by O. mykiss. |
Target species | Oncorhynchus mykiss |
Project location
Latitude | Longitude | Description |
---|---|---|
45.9062 | -119.4951 | Irrigon Fish Hatchery |
45.4178 | -117.3005 | Wallowa Fish Hatchery |
45.52 | -117.76 | Grande Ronde Subbasin |
Reasonable and Prudent Alternatives (RPAs)
Sponsor-reported:
RPA |
---|
Relevant RPAs based on NMFS/BPA review:
Reviewing agency | Action # | BiOp Agency | Description |
---|
Section 2. Past accomplishments
Year | Accomplishment |
---|
Section 3. Relationships to other projects
Project ID | Title | Description |
---|
Section 4. Budget for Planning and Design phase
Task-based budget
Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 2001 cost | Subcontractor |
---|
Outyear objectives-based budget
Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
---|
Outyear budgets for Planning and Design phase
Section 5. Budget for Construction and Implementation phase
Task-based budget
Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 2001 cost | Subcontractor |
---|
Outyear objectives-based budget
Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
---|
Outyear budgets for Construction and Implementation phase
Section 6. Budget for Operations and Maintenance phase
Task-based budget
Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 2001 cost | Subcontractor |
---|
Outyear objectives-based budget
Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
---|
Outyear budgets for Operations and Maintenance phase
Section 7. Budget for Monitoring and Evaluation phase
Task-based budget
Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 2001 cost | Subcontractor |
---|
Outyear objectives-based budget
Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
---|
Outyear budgets for Monitoring and Evaluation phase
FY 2002 | FY 2003 | FY 2004 | FY 2005 |
---|---|---|---|
$220,410 | $231,430 | $243,002 | $187,001 |
Section 8. Estimated budget summary
Itemized budget
Item | Note | FY 2001 cost |
---|---|---|
Personnel | FTE: NRS3 (0.33), NRS2 (0.75), EBA (1.33) | $82,232 |
Fringe | Permanent at 36%, Seasonal at 45% | $32,640 |
Supplies | $18,870 | |
Travel | 50 days | $3,450 |
Indirect | Currently at 20.1% | $26,853 |
PIT tags | # of tags: 1220 | $2,880 |
Subcontractor | Otolith and gill tissue analysis | $43,000 |
$209,925 |
Total estimated budget
Total FY 2001 cost | $209,925 |
Amount anticipated from previously committed BPA funds | $0 |
Total FY 2001 budget request | $209,925 |
FY 2001 forecast from 2000 | $0 |
% change from forecast | 0.0% |
Cost sharing
Organization | Item or service provided | Amount | Cash or in-kind |
---|---|---|---|
USFWS, LSRCP | Personal Services | $16,117 | in-kind |
USFWS, LSRCP | Hatchery facilities, O&M | $5,000 | in-kind |
ODFW, NE Region | Personal Services | $2,435 | in-kind |
ODFW, NE Research | Screw trap operation | $1,000 | in-kind |
CTUIR | Screw trap operation | $1,000 | in-kind |
Reviews and recommendations
This information was not provided on the original proposals, but was generated during the review process.
Comment:
This proposal for a life history study does not address imminent risks to ESA stocks by offering direct on-the-ground benefits with one-time funding.Comment:
The proposal has not been coordinated with the tribes. This is a high priority for ODFW as it addresses a critical uncertainty (contribution of resident O. mykiss to the anadromous O. mykiss) which has been identified as a possible factor determining population size. This project needs broader coordination since this is a systemwide issue.