FY 2001 High Priority proposal 23085
Contents
Section 1. General administrative information
Section 2. Past accomplishments
Section 3. Relationships to other projects
Section 4. Budgets for planning/design phase
Section 5. Budgets for construction/implementation phase
Section 6. Budgets for operations/maintenance phase
Section 7. Budgets for monitoring/evaluation phase
Section 8. Budget summary
Reviews and Recommendations
Additional documents
| Title | Type |
|---|---|
| 23085 Narrative | Narrative |
Section 1. Administrative
| Proposal title | Columbia Basin, Native American Fish Tissue Contaminant Study: Ecological Analysis Section |
| Proposal ID | 23085 |
| Organization | Yakama Nation (YN) |
| Proposal contact person or principal investigator | |
| Name | Lynn Hatcher |
| Mailing address | P.O. Box 151 Toppenish, WA 98948 |
| Phone / email | 5098656262 / Lynn@yakama.com |
| Manager authorizing this project | Lynn Hatcher |
| Review cycle | FY 2001 High Priority |
| Province / Subbasin | Systemwide / |
| Short description | To conduct an anlysis of existing proprietary fish tissue contaminant data to identify any contamination trends in species, contaminants, levels and locations included in the fish tissue contaminant study area. |
| Target species | Anadromous: Spring chinook, fall chinook, coho salmon, steelhead trout, pacific lamprey, eulachon. Resident species: rainbow trout, mountain whitefish, white sturgeon, walleye, largescale sucker, bridgelip sucker, channel catfish. |
Project location
| Latitude | Longitude | Description |
|---|---|---|
Reasonable and Prudent Alternatives (RPAs)
Sponsor-reported:
| RPA |
|---|
Relevant RPAs based on NMFS/BPA review:
| Reviewing agency | Action # | BiOp Agency | Description |
|---|
Section 2. Past accomplishments
| Year | Accomplishment |
|---|
Section 3. Relationships to other projects
| Project ID | Title | Description |
|---|
Section 4. Budget for Planning and Design phase
Task-based budget
| Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 2001 cost | Subcontractor |
|---|
Outyear objectives-based budget
| Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
|---|
Outyear budgets for Planning and Design phase
Section 5. Budget for Construction and Implementation phase
Task-based budget
| Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 2001 cost | Subcontractor |
|---|
Outyear objectives-based budget
| Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
|---|
Outyear budgets for Construction and Implementation phase
Section 6. Budget for Operations and Maintenance phase
Task-based budget
| Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 2001 cost | Subcontractor |
|---|
Outyear objectives-based budget
| Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
|---|
Outyear budgets for Operations and Maintenance phase
Section 7. Budget for Monitoring and Evaluation phase
Task-based budget
| Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 2001 cost | Subcontractor |
|---|
Outyear objectives-based budget
| Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
|---|
Outyear budgets for Monitoring and Evaluation phase
Section 8. Estimated budget summary
Itemized budget
| Item | Note | FY 2001 cost |
|---|---|---|
| Personnel | FTE: 1 | $52,950 |
| Subcontractor | .7 FTE | $72,800 |
| $125,750 | ||
Total estimated budget
| Total FY 2001 cost | $125,750 |
| Amount anticipated from previously committed BPA funds | $0 |
| Total FY 2001 budget request | $125,750 |
| FY 2001 forecast from 2000 | $0 |
| % change from forecast | 0.0% |
Cost sharing
| Organization | Item or service provided | Amount | Cash or in-kind |
|---|
Reviews and recommendations
This information was not provided on the original proposals, but was generated during the review process.
Comment:
This research proposal does not address imminent risks to ESA stocks by offering direct on-the-ground benefits with one-time funding.Comment:
This is not a high priority project for NMFS in regards to ESA listed fish. It would fulfill a data gap that would contribute to ESA recovery planning.