FY 2001 High Priority proposal 23086
Contents
Section 1. General administrative information
Section 2. Past accomplishments
Section 3. Relationships to other projects
Section 4. Budgets for planning/design phase
Section 5. Budgets for construction/implementation phase
Section 6. Budgets for operations/maintenance phase
Section 7. Budgets for monitoring/evaluation phase
Section 8. Budget summary
Reviews and Recommendations
Additional documents
Title | Type |
---|---|
23086 Narrative | Narrative |
Section 1. Administrative
Proposal title | Support for CRITFC participation in Willamette-Lower Columbia restoration activities. |
Proposal ID | 23086 |
Organization | Columbia River Inter-Tribal Fish Commission (CRITFC) |
Proposal contact person or principal investigator | |
Name | Dr. Thomas W. Backman |
Mailing address | 729 N.E. Oregon Street, Suite 200 Portland, OR 97232 |
Phone / email | 5037311267 / bact@critfc.org |
Manager authorizing this project | Don Sampson |
Review cycle | FY 2001 High Priority |
Province / Subbasin | Columbia Gorge / |
Short description | |
Target species | Chinook, Steelhead, Chum |
Project location
Latitude | Longitude | Description |
---|---|---|
45.85 | -121.4 | Columbia Gorge province |
Reasonable and Prudent Alternatives (RPAs)
Sponsor-reported:
RPA |
---|
Relevant RPAs based on NMFS/BPA review:
Reviewing agency | Action # | BiOp Agency | Description |
---|
Section 2. Past accomplishments
Year | Accomplishment |
---|
Section 3. Relationships to other projects
Project ID | Title | Description |
---|
Section 4. Budget for Planning and Design phase
Task-based budget
Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 2001 cost | Subcontractor |
---|
Outyear objectives-based budget
Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
---|
Outyear budgets for Planning and Design phase
Section 5. Budget for Construction and Implementation phase
Task-based budget
Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 2001 cost | Subcontractor |
---|
Outyear objectives-based budget
Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
---|
Outyear budgets for Construction and Implementation phase
Section 6. Budget for Operations and Maintenance phase
Task-based budget
Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 2001 cost | Subcontractor |
---|
Outyear objectives-based budget
Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
---|
Outyear budgets for Operations and Maintenance phase
Section 7. Budget for Monitoring and Evaluation phase
Task-based budget
Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 2001 cost | Subcontractor |
---|
Outyear objectives-based budget
Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
---|
Outyear budgets for Monitoring and Evaluation phase
Section 8. Estimated budget summary
Itemized budget
Item | Note | FY 2001 cost |
---|---|---|
Personnel | FTE: 1 | $64,800 |
Fringe | 31.5% Salaries | $20,412 |
Supplies | SAS, Postage, Phone | $3,400 |
Travel | $715 | |
Indirect | 36.9% | $32,962 |
$122,289 |
Total estimated budget
Total FY 2001 cost | $122,289 |
Amount anticipated from previously committed BPA funds | $0 |
Total FY 2001 budget request | $122,289 |
FY 2001 forecast from 2000 | $0 |
% change from forecast | 0.0% |
Cost sharing
Organization | Item or service provided | Amount | Cash or in-kind |
---|
Reviews and recommendations
This information was not provided on the original proposals, but was generated during the review process.
Comment:
This proposal for staff participation in Willamette-Lower Columbia restoration activities does not address imminent risks to ESA stocks by offering direct on-the-ground benefits with one-time funding.Comment:
This project will not provide any direct benefits to anadromous fish.