FY 2001 High Priority proposal 23092
Contents
Section 1. General administrative information
Section 2. Past accomplishments
Section 3. Relationships to other projects
Section 4. Budgets for planning/design phase
Section 5. Budgets for construction/implementation phase
Section 6. Budgets for operations/maintenance phase
Section 7. Budgets for monitoring/evaluation phase
Section 8. Budget summary
Reviews and Recommendations
Additional documents
| Title | Type |
|---|---|
| 23092 Narrative | Narrative |
Section 1. Administrative
| Proposal title | Genetic relationship of steelhead in North East Oregon |
| Proposal ID | 23092 |
| Organization | Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife (ODFW) |
| Proposal contact person or principal investigator | |
| Name | James R. Ruzycki |
| Mailing address | 211 Inlow Hall, EOU, One University Blvd. La Grande, OR 97850 |
| Phone / email | 5419623777 / jruzycki@eou.edu |
| Manager authorizing this project | Richard W. Carmichael |
| Review cycle | FY 2001 High Priority |
| Province / Subbasin | Blue Mountain / Grande Ronde |
| Short description | Determine genetic composition of steelhead in the Grande Ronde and Imnaha River basins. Define management units to develop future management plans and actions for endemic populations. |
| Target species | Steelhead |
Project location
| Latitude | Longitude | Description |
|---|---|---|
| 45.52 | -117.76 | Grande Ronde subbasin |
| 45.52 | -117.76 | Imnaha subbasin |
Reasonable and Prudent Alternatives (RPAs)
Sponsor-reported:
| RPA |
|---|
Relevant RPAs based on NMFS/BPA review:
| Reviewing agency | Action # | BiOp Agency | Description |
|---|
Section 2. Past accomplishments
| Year | Accomplishment |
|---|
Section 3. Relationships to other projects
| Project ID | Title | Description |
|---|
Section 4. Budget for Planning and Design phase
Task-based budget
| Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 2001 cost | Subcontractor |
|---|
Outyear objectives-based budget
| Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
|---|
Outyear budgets for Planning and Design phase
Section 5. Budget for Construction and Implementation phase
Task-based budget
| Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 2001 cost | Subcontractor |
|---|
Outyear objectives-based budget
| Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
|---|
Outyear budgets for Construction and Implementation phase
Section 6. Budget for Operations and Maintenance phase
Task-based budget
| Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 2001 cost | Subcontractor |
|---|
Outyear objectives-based budget
| Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
|---|
Outyear budgets for Operations and Maintenance phase
Section 7. Budget for Monitoring and Evaluation phase
Task-based budget
| Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 2001 cost | Subcontractor |
|---|
Outyear objectives-based budget
| Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
|---|
Outyear budgets for Monitoring and Evaluation phase
Section 8. Estimated budget summary
Itemized budget
| Item | Note | FY 2001 cost |
|---|---|---|
| Personnel | $14,224 | |
| Fringe | $5,743 | |
| Supplies | $1,700 | |
| Travel | $1,500 | |
| Indirect | $6,163 | |
| Subcontractor | $237,600 | |
| $266,930 | ||
Total estimated budget
| Total FY 2001 cost | $266,930 |
| Amount anticipated from previously committed BPA funds | $0 |
| Total FY 2001 budget request | $266,930 |
| FY 2001 forecast from 2000 | $0 |
| % change from forecast | 0.0% |
Cost sharing
| Organization | Item or service provided | Amount | Cash or in-kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| ODFW | personnel time for sampling, data entry, and analysis | $25,000 | cash |
Reviews and recommendations
This information was not provided on the original proposals, but was generated during the review process.
Comment:
This proposal would provide information to develop future plans and actions and thus does not address imminent risks to ESA stocks by offering direct on-the-ground benefits with one-time funding.Comment:
As a study, this proposal would not provide direct benefits. This project will be funded under the Lower Snake River Compensation Plan.