FY 2001 High Priority proposal 23095
Contents
Section 1. General administrative information
Section 2. Past accomplishments
Section 3. Relationships to other projects
Section 4. Budgets for planning/design phase
Section 5. Budgets for construction/implementation phase
Section 6. Budgets for operations/maintenance phase
Section 7. Budgets for monitoring/evaluation phase
Section 8. Budget summary
Reviews and Recommendations
Additional documents
Title | Type |
---|---|
Willamette Valley Aerial Photography and Digital Mapping | Narrative Attachment |
23095 Narrative | Narrative |
Section 1. Administrative
Proposal title | Aerial Photography and Digital Mapping of the floodplain of the Willamette River |
Proposal ID | 23095 |
Organization | Oregon Department of Geology and Mineral Industries (DOGAMI) |
Proposal contact person or principal investigator | |
Name | Gary W. Lynch |
Mailing address | 1536 Queen SE Albany, OR 97321 |
Phone / email | 5419672039 / gary.w.lynch@state.or.us |
Manager authorizing this project | Gary W Lynch |
Review cycle | FY 2001 High Priority |
Province / Subbasin | Lower Columbia / Willamette |
Short description | Provide aerial photography and a digital elevation model with vertical resolution suitable for the production of engineering quality maps of the majority of the 100 year flood plain of the Willamette River. |
Target species | All species |
Project location
Latitude | Longitude | Description |
---|---|---|
44.64 | -123.11 | Willamette River |
Reasonable and Prudent Alternatives (RPAs)
Sponsor-reported:
RPA |
---|
Relevant RPAs based on NMFS/BPA review:
Reviewing agency | Action # | BiOp Agency | Description |
---|
Section 2. Past accomplishments
Year | Accomplishment |
---|
Section 3. Relationships to other projects
Project ID | Title | Description |
---|
Section 4. Budget for Planning and Design phase
Task-based budget
Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 2001 cost | Subcontractor |
---|
Outyear objectives-based budget
Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
---|
Outyear budgets for Planning and Design phase
Section 5. Budget for Construction and Implementation phase
Task-based budget
Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 2001 cost | Subcontractor |
---|
Outyear objectives-based budget
Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
---|
Outyear budgets for Construction and Implementation phase
Section 6. Budget for Operations and Maintenance phase
Task-based budget
Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 2001 cost | Subcontractor |
---|
Outyear objectives-based budget
Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
---|
Outyear budgets for Operations and Maintenance phase
Section 7. Budget for Monitoring and Evaluation phase
Task-based budget
Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 2001 cost | Subcontractor |
---|
Outyear objectives-based budget
Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
---|
Outyear budgets for Monitoring and Evaluation phase
Section 8. Estimated budget summary
Itemized budget
Item | Note | FY 2001 cost |
---|---|---|
Personnel | FTE: NRS IV $4870 NRS II $3580 x 12 Proj. Admin. 0.2 FTE $974 x 12 | $113,088 |
Fringe | NRS IV $1607 NRS II $1181 Admin. $321 x 12 | $37,308 |
Supplies | $30,000 | |
Travel | $5,000 | |
Indirect | 17.4% | $32,259 |
Subcontractor | photography & mapping | $830,000 |
$1,047,655 |
Total estimated budget
Total FY 2001 cost | $1,047,655 |
Amount anticipated from previously committed BPA funds | $0 |
Total FY 2001 budget request | $1,047,655 |
FY 2001 forecast from 2000 | $0 |
% change from forecast | 0.0% |
Cost sharing
Organization | Item or service provided | Amount | Cash or in-kind |
---|
Reviews and recommendations
This information was not provided on the original proposals, but was generated during the review process.
Comment:
This proposal for aerial photography and digital mapping does not address imminent risks to ESA stocks by offering direct on-the-ground benefits with one-time funding.Comment:
This project is a data collection effort. This project proposes monitoring efforts that need to be discussed at a systemwide scale. The scale and scope of this type of project needs to be defined at a regional level. This increment of resolution may not be necessary for the F+W Program.