FY 2001 Innovative proposal 22025
Contents
Section 1. General administrative information
Section 2. Past accomplishments
Section 3. Relationships to other projects
Section 4. Budgets for planning/design phase
Section 5. Budgets for construction/implementation phase
Section 6. Budgets for operations/maintenance phase
Section 7. Budgets for monitoring/evaluation phase
Section 8. Budget summary
Reviews and Recommendations
Additional documents
Title | Type |
---|---|
22025 Narrative | Narrative |
Section 1. Administrative
Proposal title | Identification and assessment of technologies and methods to census spawning adult population size of spring and summer chinook salmon |
Proposal ID | 22025 |
Organization | Nez Perce Tribe (NPT) |
Proposal contact person or principal investigator | |
Name | Rick Orme |
Mailing address | PO Box 1942 McCall, ID 83638 |
Phone / email | 2086345390 / RickO@NezPerce.org |
Manager authorizing this project | Jamie Pinkham |
Review cycle | FY 2001 Innovative |
Province / Subbasin | Mountain Snake / Salmon |
Short description | Identification of new and inovative methods to accurately and precisely enumerate chinook salmon spawner abundance. |
Target species | Chinook Salmon |
Project location
Latitude | Longitude | Description |
---|---|---|
44.3042 | -114.3593 | Poverty Flat |
45.0248 | -115.7065 | Secesh River |
44.9625 | -115.5008 | Johnson Creek |
44.5546 | -115.2974 | Sulphur Creek |
44.4493 | -115.2301 | Marsh Creek |
44.4105 | -115.3717 | Elk Creek |
44.4492 | -115.2301 | Bear Valley |
Reasonable and Prudent Alternatives (RPAs)
Sponsor-reported:
RPA |
---|
Relevant RPAs based on NMFS/BPA review:
Reviewing agency | Action # | BiOp Agency | Description |
---|
Section 2. Past accomplishments
Year | Accomplishment |
---|
Section 3. Relationships to other projects
Project ID | Title | Description |
---|
Section 4. Budget for Planning and Design phase
Task-based budget
Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 2001 cost | Subcontractor |
---|
Outyear objectives-based budget
Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
---|
Outyear budgets for Planning and Design phase
Section 5. Budget for Construction and Implementation phase
Task-based budget
Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 2001 cost | Subcontractor |
---|
Outyear objectives-based budget
Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
---|
Outyear budgets for Construction and Implementation phase
Section 6. Budget for Operations and Maintenance phase
Task-based budget
Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 2001 cost | Subcontractor |
---|
Outyear objectives-based budget
Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
---|
Outyear budgets for Operations and Maintenance phase
Section 7. Budget for Monitoring and Evaluation phase
Task-based budget
Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 2001 cost | Subcontractor |
---|
Outyear objectives-based budget
Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
---|
Outyear budgets for Monitoring and Evaluation phase
Section 8. Estimated budget summary
Itemized budget
Item | Note | FY 2001 cost |
---|---|---|
Personnel | FTE: 3.5 (1.75 in FY 2001, 1.75 in FY 2002) | $113,000 |
Fringe | For FY 2001 and FY 2002 | $38,000 |
Supplies | For FY 2001 and FY 2002 | $35,000 |
Travel | For FY 2001 and FY 2002 | $15,000 |
Indirect | For FY 2001 and FY 2002 | $45,000 |
Subcontractor | # of tags: Preliminary and final engenerring design | $150,000 |
$396,000 |
Total estimated budget
Total FY 2001 cost | $396,000 |
Total FY 2001 budget request | $396,000 |
Cost sharing
Organization | Item or service provided | Amount | Cash or in-kind |
---|
Reviews and recommendations
This information was not provided on the original proposals, but was generated during the review process.
Comment:
The proposal does not meet the requirements of an innovative proposal. It does not propose to develop new procedures and methods for estimation of spawner abundance with a design for monitoring and evaluation of results. The sponsors ask for funds to "Identify all available methods and technologies that would allow for accurate total abundance of spring and summer chinook salmon during the entire run." To be funded, this proposal should identify, discuss, and propose to evaluate an innovative procedure (or procedures) to accurately estimate total abundance of spawners. The proposal addresses a problem of critical importance in the basin, i.e. enumeration of spawning populations of salmon and steelhead. Innovative approaches are needed to address the problem. While the idea is commendable and ought to be pursued, it does not meet the Council's standards for innovative projects.Comment:
Agree with ISRP comments.Comment:
Agree with ISRP comments.