FY 2001 Innovative proposal 22046
Contents
Section 1. General administrative information
Section 2. Past accomplishments
Section 3. Relationships to other projects
Section 4. Budgets for planning/design phase
Section 5. Budgets for construction/implementation phase
Section 6. Budgets for operations/maintenance phase
Section 7. Budgets for monitoring/evaluation phase
Section 8. Budget summary
Reviews and Recommendations
Additional documents
Title | Type |
---|---|
22046 Narrative | Narrative |
Section 1. Administrative
Proposal title | Deschutes Subbasin Stakeholder Facilitation - A Pilot Project Copyright October 30, 2000. TIGERS Success Series, PO Box 267, Bend, OR 97709. |
Proposal ID | 22046 |
Organization | TIGERS Success Series (TIGERS) |
Proposal contact person or principal investigator | |
Name | Dianne M. Crampton |
Mailing address | PO Box 267 Bend, Oregon 97709 |
Phone / email | 5413857465 / tigers@ucinet.com |
Manager authorizing this project | Dianne M. Crampton |
Review cycle | FY 2001 Innovative |
Province / Subbasin | Columbia Plateau / Deschutes |
Short description | Locally-driven facilitation of Deschutes Subbasin stakeholders that will create a process and template for local participation in the NWPPC's and Federal Agencies' Subbasin planning and habitat restoration efforts. |
Target species | Columbia Basin Fish and Wildlife |
Project location
Latitude | Longitude | Description |
---|---|---|
44.35 | -121 | Deschutes subbasin |
Reasonable and Prudent Alternatives (RPAs)
Sponsor-reported:
RPA |
---|
Relevant RPAs based on NMFS/BPA review:
Reviewing agency | Action # | BiOp Agency | Description |
---|
Section 2. Past accomplishments
Year | Accomplishment |
---|
Section 3. Relationships to other projects
Project ID | Title | Description |
---|
Section 4. Budget for Planning and Design phase
Task-based budget
Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 2001 cost | Subcontractor |
---|
Outyear objectives-based budget
Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
---|
Outyear budgets for Planning and Design phase
Section 5. Budget for Construction and Implementation phase
Task-based budget
Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 2001 cost | Subcontractor |
---|
Outyear objectives-based budget
Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
---|
Outyear budgets for Construction and Implementation phase
Section 6. Budget for Operations and Maintenance phase
Task-based budget
Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 2001 cost | Subcontractor |
---|
Outyear objectives-based budget
Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
---|
Outyear budgets for Operations and Maintenance phase
Section 7. Budget for Monitoring and Evaluation phase
Task-based budget
Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 2001 cost | Subcontractor |
---|
Outyear objectives-based budget
Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
---|
Outyear budgets for Monitoring and Evaluation phase
Section 8. Estimated budget summary
Itemized budget
Item | Note | FY 2001 cost |
---|---|---|
Personnel | FTE: 2 (1 fulltime facilitator/consultant and 3 part time support providers) | $60,900 |
Supplies | telephone bills, packaging, equipment rental, recording equipment, lap top, facilitation supplies | $5,400 |
Travel | Council and Stakeholder Community meetings | $2,700 |
$69,000 |
Total estimated budget
Total FY 2001 cost | $69,000 |
Total FY 2001 budget request | $69,000 |
Cost sharing
Organization | Item or service provided | Amount | Cash or in-kind |
---|---|---|---|
TIGERS | Office space, computers, printers, fax, e-mail services, phones | $12,000 | in-kind |
Stakeholders | Meeting space, distribution lists, phone contacts, volunteer facilitators | $5,000 | in-kind |
Council and BPA | Reports and briefing documents | $1,000 | in-kind |
Information Providers | $3,000 | in-kind |
Reviews and recommendations
This information was not provided on the original proposals, but was generated during the review process.
Comment:
This proposal to apply facilitation to stakeholder processes is not innovative. The project would develop a template for using stakeholder input in subbasin planning based on this pilot effort. This type of proposal probably should be submitted for general funding under the Fish and Wildlife Program.Comment:
Agree with ISRP comments.Comment:
Agree with ISRP comments.