FY 2001 Innovative proposal 22054
Contents
Section 1. General administrative information
Section 2. Past accomplishments
Section 3. Relationships to other projects
Section 4. Budgets for planning/design phase
Section 5. Budgets for construction/implementation phase
Section 6. Budgets for operations/maintenance phase
Section 7. Budgets for monitoring/evaluation phase
Section 8. Budget summary
Reviews and Recommendations
Additional documents
Title | Type |
---|---|
Project movie (100MB) | Narrative Attachment |
22054 Narrative | Narrative |
Section 1. Administrative
Proposal title | Effects of Chronic Disease on Delayed Mortality of Chinook Salmon and Steelhead Trout in the Columbia River Estuary |
Proposal ID | 22054 |
Organization | Oregon State University (OSU) |
Proposal contact person or principal investigator | |
Name | Jerri L. Bartholomew |
Mailing address | Dept. of Microbiology, Nash Hall 220, OSU Corvallis, OR 97331-3804 |
Phone / email | 5417371856 / bartholj@bcc.orst.edu |
Manager authorizing this project | |
Review cycle | FY 2001 Innovative |
Province / Subbasin | Columbia Estuary / |
Short description | Evaluate the outcome of chronic infections in salmon as they enter sea water and develop methods for predicting pathogen-related delayed mortality in the ocean. |
Target species | chinook salmon, steelhead trout |
Project location
Latitude | Longitude | Description |
---|---|---|
46.13 | -123.56 | Columbia Estuary |
Reasonable and Prudent Alternatives (RPAs)
Sponsor-reported:
RPA |
---|
Relevant RPAs based on NMFS/BPA review:
Reviewing agency | Action # | BiOp Agency | Description |
---|
Section 2. Past accomplishments
Year | Accomplishment |
---|
Section 3. Relationships to other projects
Project ID | Title | Description |
---|
Section 4. Budget for Planning and Design phase
Task-based budget
Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 2001 cost | Subcontractor |
---|
Outyear objectives-based budget
Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
---|
Outyear budgets for Planning and Design phase
Section 5. Budget for Construction and Implementation phase
Task-based budget
Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 2001 cost | Subcontractor |
---|
Outyear objectives-based budget
Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
---|
Outyear budgets for Construction and Implementation phase
Section 6. Budget for Operations and Maintenance phase
Task-based budget
Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 2001 cost | Subcontractor |
---|
Outyear objectives-based budget
Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
---|
Outyear budgets for Operations and Maintenance phase
Section 7. Budget for Monitoring and Evaluation phase
Task-based budget
Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 2001 cost | Subcontractor |
---|
Outyear objectives-based budget
Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
---|
Outyear budgets for Monitoring and Evaluation phase
Section 8. Estimated budget summary
Itemized budget
Item | Note | FY 2001 cost |
---|---|---|
Personnel | FTE: 2.84 | $160,417 |
Fringe | $58,598 | |
Supplies | reagents and supplies for diagnostic and immunological assays; tank charges | $63,000 |
Travel | $5,100 | |
Indirect | 43% on campus and 26% off campus rates | $91,838 |
tuition | $14,778 | |
$393,731 |
Total estimated budget
Total FY 2001 cost | $393,731 |
Total FY 2001 budget request | $393,731 |
Cost sharing
Organization | Item or service provided | Amount | Cash or in-kind |
---|
Reviews and recommendations
This information was not provided on the original proposals, but was generated during the review process.
Comment:
A well-prepared proposal with a high probability of contributing to recovery, however this proposal is not particularly innovative. The study is relevant to concerns about estuary transition and delayed mortality and consequently funding might be pursued through avenues other than the innovative solicitation process. The personnel are qualified.Comment:
Agree with ISRP comments.Comment:
Agree with ISRP comments.