FY 2001 Innovative proposal 22055
Contents
Section 1. General administrative information
Section 2. Past accomplishments
Section 3. Relationships to other projects
Section 4. Budgets for planning/design phase
Section 5. Budgets for construction/implementation phase
Section 6. Budgets for operations/maintenance phase
Section 7. Budgets for monitoring/evaluation phase
Section 8. Budget summary
Reviews and Recommendations
Additional documents
| Title | Type |
|---|---|
| 22055 Narrative | Narrative |
Section 1. Administrative
| Proposal title | Develop a Nutrient/Food-Web Management Tool for Watershed-River Systems |
| Proposal ID | 22055 |
| Organization | Battelle Memorial Institute (Battelle) |
| Proposal contact person or principal investigator | |
| Name | Marshall C. Richmond |
| Mailing address | PO Box 999, MS K9-33 Richland, WA 99352 |
| Phone / email | 5093726241 / marshall.richmond@pnl.gov |
| Manager authorizing this project | Dennis D. Dauble |
| Review cycle | FY 2001 Innovative |
| Province / Subbasin | Systemwide / Systemwide |
| Short description | Develop a integrated analysis system by linking state-of-the-art watershed and river models together with nutrient and food-chain component models. The system can be used to perform assessments of nutrient supplementation schemes. |
| Target species | Anadromous Fish |
Project location
| Latitude | Longitude | Description |
|---|
Reasonable and Prudent Alternatives (RPAs)
Sponsor-reported:
| RPA |
|---|
Relevant RPAs based on NMFS/BPA review:
| Reviewing agency | Action # | BiOp Agency | Description |
|---|
Section 2. Past accomplishments
| Year | Accomplishment |
|---|
Section 3. Relationships to other projects
| Project ID | Title | Description |
|---|
Section 4. Budget for Planning and Design phase
Task-based budget
| Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 2001 cost | Subcontractor |
|---|
Outyear objectives-based budget
| Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
|---|
Outyear budgets for Planning and Design phase
Section 5. Budget for Construction and Implementation phase
Task-based budget
| Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 2001 cost | Subcontractor |
|---|
Outyear objectives-based budget
| Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
|---|
Outyear budgets for Construction and Implementation phase
Section 6. Budget for Operations and Maintenance phase
Task-based budget
| Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 2001 cost | Subcontractor |
|---|
Outyear objectives-based budget
| Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
|---|
Outyear budgets for Operations and Maintenance phase
Section 7. Budget for Monitoring and Evaluation phase
Task-based budget
| Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 2001 cost | Subcontractor |
|---|
Outyear objectives-based budget
| Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
|---|
Outyear budgets for Monitoring and Evaluation phase
Section 8. Estimated budget summary
Itemized budget
| Item | Note | FY 2001 cost |
|---|---|---|
| Personnel | FTE: 1.47 | $101,668 |
| Fringe | $26,534 | |
| Supplies | $1,597 | |
| Travel | $2,969 | |
| Indirect | $196,200 | |
| Capital | $0 | |
| PIT tags | $0 | |
| Subcontractor | $0 | |
| Other | $32 | |
| $329,000 | ||
Total estimated budget
| Total FY 2001 cost | $329,000 |
| Total FY 2001 budget request | $329,000 |
Cost sharing
| Organization | Item or service provided | Amount | Cash or in-kind |
|---|
Reviews and recommendations
This information was not provided on the original proposals, but was generated during the review process.
Comment:
The ISRP was favorably impressed by this well written innovative nutrient proposal. It is different than the other nutrient proposals in that it does not propose to actually supplement with nutrients. Instead, it proposes to help determine whether a system is nutrient deficient and assess what is required, a step the ISRP supports and judges necessary before informed decisions can be made. If the region is going to supplement with nutrients, then this type of model will be beneficial and should be universally available.Comment:
See general nutrient supplementation comments in report.Comment:
See general nutrient supplementation comments in report.