FY 2001 Innovative proposal 22062

Section 1. General administrative information
Section 2. Past accomplishments
Section 3. Relationships to other projects
Section 4. Budgets for planning/design phase
Section 5. Budgets for construction/implementation phase
Section 6. Budgets for operations/maintenance phase
Section 7. Budgets for monitoring/evaluation phase
Section 8. Budget summary

Reviews and Recommendations

Additional documents

Title	Type
22062 Narrative	Narrative

Section 1. Administrative

Proposal title	Evaluate the use of anaerobic digestion to produce nutrient supplements for trout and salmon
Proposal ID	22062
Organization	Duke Engineering and Services (DE&S)
Proposal contact person or principal investigator
Name	Leland C. Powell
Mailing address	P.O. Box 3004 Richland, WA 99352
Phone / email	2066342553 / lcpowell@dukeengineering.com
Manager authorizing this project	Paul Viggiano
Review cycle	FY 2001 Innovative
Province / Subbasin	Systemwide / Systemwide
Short description	Develop environmentally beneficial uses and model for dairy farm manure including salmon and trout nutrient supplement, organic fertilizer, and renewable energy
Target species	Salmon and trout

Project location

Latitude	Longitude	Description

Reasonable and Prudent Alternatives (RPAs)

Sponsor-reported:

RPA

Relevant RPAs based on NMFS/BPA review:

Reviewing agency	Action #	BiOp Agency	Description

Section 2. Past accomplishments

Year	Accomplishment

Section 3. Relationships to other projects

Project ID	Title	Description

Section 4. Budget for Planning and Design phase

Task-based budget

Objective	Task	Duration in FYs	Estimated 2001 cost	Subcontractor

Outyear objectives-based budget

Objective	Starting FY	Ending FY	Estimated cost

Outyear budgets for Planning and Design phase

Section 5. Budget for Construction and Implementation phase

Task-based budget

Objective	Task	Duration in FYs	Estimated 2001 cost	Subcontractor

Outyear objectives-based budget

Objective	Starting FY	Ending FY	Estimated cost

Outyear budgets for Construction and Implementation phase

Section 6. Budget for Operations and Maintenance phase

Task-based budget

Objective	Task	Duration in FYs	Estimated 2001 cost	Subcontractor

Outyear objectives-based budget

Objective	Starting FY	Ending FY	Estimated cost

Outyear budgets for Operations and Maintenance phase

Section 7. Budget for Monitoring and Evaluation phase

Task-based budget

Objective	Task	Duration in FYs	Estimated 2001 cost	Subcontractor

Outyear objectives-based budget

Objective	Starting FY	Ending FY	Estimated cost

Outyear budgets for Monitoring and Evaluation phase

Section 8. Estimated budget summary

Itemized budget

Item	Note	FY 2001 cost
Personnel	FTE: 0.5	$100,900
Travel		$6,000
Capital	Trailer mounted anaerobic digester	$17,500
Other	Samples	$10,400
		$134,800

Total estimated budget

Total FY 2001 cost	$134,800
Total FY 2001 budget request	$134,800

Cost sharing

Organization	Item or service provided	Amount	Cash or in-kind
DE&S	Engineering services	$10,000	in-kind

Reviews and recommendations

This information was not provided on the original proposals, but was generated during the review process.

REVIEW:
ISRP Review (ISRP 2000-10)

Recommendation:
Not Innovative

Date:
Dec 15, 2000

Comment:

This proposal boils down to manufacturing anaerobic composting units using livestock manure, and then "demonstrating the use" of those nutrients produced for at least one fish species. The proposal does not communicate how composting manure would produce nutrient supplements. Reviewers were unconvinced of the feasibility and priority of this effort.