FY 2001 Innovative proposal 22063

Section 1. Administrative

Proposal titleDetermination of difficult passage areas, migration patterns and energetic use of upriver migrating salmon and steelhead
Proposal ID22063
OrganizationPacific Northwest National Laboratory (PNNL)
Proposal contact person or principal investigator
NameDavid R. Geist
Mailing addressMS K6-85, P. O. Box 999 Richland, WA 99352
Phone / email5093759720 / david.geist@pnl.gov
Manager authorizing this projectDavid R. Geist
Review cycleFY 2001 Innovative
Province / SubbasinColumbia Gorge / Klickitat
Short descriptionThe goal of this project is to pin-point areas of difficult fish passage under different flow regimes using EMG telemetry and to examine movements, habitat use, and energetic consumption of fish during the upstream migration
Target speciesChinook salmon, coho salmon, steelhead
Project location
LatitudeLongitudeDescription
45.6914 -121.2934 Klickitat River
Reasonable and Prudent Alternatives (RPAs)

Sponsor-reported:

RPA

Relevant RPAs based on NMFS/BPA review:

Reviewing agencyAction #BiOp AgencyDescription

Section 2. Past accomplishments

YearAccomplishment

Section 3. Relationships to other projects

Project IDTitleDescription

Section 4. Budget for Planning and Design phase

Task-based budget
ObjectiveTaskDuration in FYsEstimated 2001 costSubcontractor
Outyear objectives-based budget
ObjectiveStarting FYEnding FYEstimated cost
Outyear budgets for Planning and Design phase

Section 5. Budget for Construction and Implementation phase

Task-based budget
ObjectiveTaskDuration in FYsEstimated 2001 costSubcontractor
Outyear objectives-based budget
ObjectiveStarting FYEnding FYEstimated cost
Outyear budgets for Construction and Implementation phase

Section 6. Budget for Operations and Maintenance phase

Task-based budget
ObjectiveTaskDuration in FYsEstimated 2001 costSubcontractor
Outyear objectives-based budget
ObjectiveStarting FYEnding FYEstimated cost
Outyear budgets for Operations and Maintenance phase

Section 7. Budget for Monitoring and Evaluation phase

Task-based budget
ObjectiveTaskDuration in FYsEstimated 2001 costSubcontractor
Outyear objectives-based budget
ObjectiveStarting FYEnding FYEstimated cost
Outyear budgets for Monitoring and Evaluation phase

Section 8. Estimated budget summary

Itemized budget
ItemNoteFY 2001 cost
Personnel $93,254
Fringe 26.7% $34,490
Supplies $112,220
Travel On-site per diem (173 man days) and 3 one-day trips for meetings $31,324
Indirect Primarily organizational overheads (e.g., facilities, equipment, maintenance, etc.) $37,154
Subcontractor $11,100
$319,542
Total estimated budget
Total FY 2001 cost$319,542
Total FY 2001 budget request$319,542
Cost sharing
OrganizationItem or service providedAmountCash or in-kind

Reviews and recommendations

This information was not provided on the original proposals, but was generated during the review process.

Recommendation:
3; Yes - A -fund thru C Gorge
Date:
Dec 15, 2000

Comment:

This proposal was reviewed favorably in the Columbia Gorge province and fits in the provincial review as well as in this innovative solicitation. It is innovative and provides an opportunity to critically examine fish passage problems identified in the Klickitat River and elsewhere. It is an excellent proposal with local and regional application. If there is concern about the degree of fish passage problems in the Klickitat, then this work should be undertaken before KFP proceeds with major expenditures on fish passage. The ISRP identified it as a high priority fundable project in the Columbia Gorge Rolling Review (for further comments, see that report). It should not fall through the cracks, and is recommended for funding either here or through the Gorge province. The proposal is well targeted and meritorious. We had some question as to whether the proposal is over budgeted. The proposal shows a duration of two fiscal years, with over $300k for the first year. If funded with the innovative proposals, then it should be assured that this work can be done for under $400,000 during the Council review and BPA contracting period.
Recommendation:
Recommended Action
Date:
Jan 17, 2001

Comment:

This project has demonstrated very limited application for management decisions. The ISRP continues to propose that this research would direct placement of fish ladders and removal of passage barriers, however, the work has not been proven for that capacity at this time. The work has merit but is not considered a high priority at this time.
Recommendation:
Recommended Action
Date:
Jan 17, 2001

Comment:

This project has demonstrated very limited application for management decisions. The ISRP continues to propose that this research would direct placement of fish ladders and removal of passage barriers, however, the work has not been proven for that capacity at this time. The work has merit but is not considered a high priority at this time.