FY 2001 Innovative proposal 22066
Contents
Section 1. General administrative information
Section 2. Past accomplishments
Section 3. Relationships to other projects
Section 4. Budgets for planning/design phase
Section 5. Budgets for construction/implementation phase
Section 6. Budgets for operations/maintenance phase
Section 7. Budgets for monitoring/evaluation phase
Section 8. Budget summary
Reviews and Recommendations
Additional documents
Title | Type |
---|---|
22066 Narrative | Narrative |
Section 1. Administrative
Proposal title | Live Capture Harvest |
Proposal ID | 22066 |
Organization | Steven Vigg & Company |
Proposal contact person or principal investigator | |
Name | Steven C. Vigg |
Mailing address | 42418 East Larch Mountain Road Corbett, Oregon 97019 |
Phone / email | 5036953433 / Vigg@teleport.com |
Manager authorizing this project | Steven C. Vigg |
Review cycle | FY 2001 Innovative |
Province / Subbasin | Systemwide / Systemwide |
Short description | Test feasibility of live capture harvest techniques for anadromous salmonids in the Columbia Basin |
Target species | anadromous salmonids |
Project location
Latitude | Longitude | Description |
---|
Reasonable and Prudent Alternatives (RPAs)
Sponsor-reported:
RPA |
---|
Relevant RPAs based on NMFS/BPA review:
Reviewing agency | Action # | BiOp Agency | Description |
---|
Section 2. Past accomplishments
Year | Accomplishment |
---|
Section 3. Relationships to other projects
Project ID | Title | Description |
---|
Section 4. Budget for Planning and Design phase
Task-based budget
Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 2001 cost | Subcontractor |
---|
Outyear objectives-based budget
Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
---|
Outyear budgets for Planning and Design phase
Section 5. Budget for Construction and Implementation phase
Task-based budget
Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 2001 cost | Subcontractor |
---|
Outyear objectives-based budget
Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
---|
Outyear budgets for Construction and Implementation phase
Section 6. Budget for Operations and Maintenance phase
Task-based budget
Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 2001 cost | Subcontractor |
---|
Outyear objectives-based budget
Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
---|
Outyear budgets for Operations and Maintenance phase
Section 7. Budget for Monitoring and Evaluation phase
Task-based budget
Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 2001 cost | Subcontractor |
---|
Outyear objectives-based budget
Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
---|
Outyear budgets for Monitoring and Evaluation phase
Section 8. Estimated budget summary
Itemized budget
Item | Note | FY 2001 cost |
---|---|---|
Personnel | FTE: (232 hrs) | $19,952 |
Fringe | $0 | |
Supplies | $0 | |
Travel | $0 | |
Indirect | $2,958 | |
Capital | $0 | |
PIT tags | $0 | |
Subcontractor | # of tags: S.P. Cramer & Associates, Inc. (112 hrs) | $9,632 |
Other | $0 | |
$32,542 |
Total estimated budget
Total FY 2001 cost | $32,542 |
Total FY 2001 budget request | $32,542 |
Cost sharing
Organization | Item or service provided | Amount | Cash or in-kind |
---|
Reviews and recommendations
This information was not provided on the original proposals, but was generated during the review process.
Comment:
This is not innovative, but is potentially useful in the Columbia River. A decision to implement live capture harvest is a policy decision. The absence of live capture harvest in the Columbia Basin is a socio-political issue, since the gear is prohibited by state law, and, as far as we know, is not permitted by the treaty tribes. Clearly, live capture harvest offers the opportunity to continue to fish in areas with mixed stocks of fish, where the target stock is abundant, but endangered or threatened stocks are taken as incidental catch. As for the technical issue, much information is available on live capture technology, and the subsequent survival of released fish. A summary of such information might be useful in addressing the policy issue.Comment:
Agree with ISRP comments.Comment:
Agree with ISRP comments.